Using a Pidgin Language in Formal Education: Help or Hindrance?

Pidgin and Creole languages are rarely used informal education because of three arguments (1) they are degenerate languages, (2) it is a waste of time to use a pidgin or creole when the standard language is the key to success in education and employment, and (3) theuseofapidginor creole will interfere with students' subsequent acquisition of the standard language Linguists can easily refute the first two arguments, but not the third, because of the special circumstances when apidgin or creole is LI and its lexifier language is L2 This article presents the results of research which examines the claims of the third argument This research is part of an evaluation of a preschool program in Papua New Guinea which uses Tok Pisin (Melanesian Pidgin English) as themedium of instruction and initial literacy for students who thengoon loan English-medium community school The results show that initial instruction in Tok Pisin is actually more of a help than a hindrance to learning English and other subjects